Arch Specialty Insurance Company v. Minhas Construction Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Arch Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant: Minhas Construction Corp. and KVA Electric, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2023cv05537
Filed: July 21, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Peggy Kuo
Referring Judge: Allyne R Ross
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2023 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Arch Specialty Insurance Company. KVA Electric, Inc. served on 9/7/2023, answer due 9/28/2023; Minhas Construction Corp. served on 9/7/2023, answer due 9/28/2023. (Vilenchik, Vitaly)
September 1, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to send a copy of the Summons and Complaint to Defendants at the business addresses listed in the Complaint and file proof of such mailing on the docket by September 9, 2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 9/1/2023. (RO)
July 31, 2023 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Arch Specialty Insurance Company. KVA Electric, Inc. served on 7/25/2023, answer due 8/15/2023. (Vilenchik, Vitaly)
July 31, 2023 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Arch Specialty Insurance Company. Minhas Construction Corp. served on 7/25/2023, answer due 8/15/2023. (Vilenchik, Vitaly)
July 25, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE Designating Case To Arbitration. This case has been designated to participate in the non-binding Court Annexed Arbitration Program pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.7: https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/local_rules/localrules.pdf The Rule requires the Clerk of Court to designate and process for compulsory arbitration "all civil cases (excluding social security cases, tax matters, prisoners' civil rights cases, and any action based on an alleged violation of a right secured by the Constitution of the United States or if jurisdiction is based in whole or in part on Title 28 U.S.C. sec. 1343) wherein money damages only are being sought in an amount not in excess of $150,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs." Damages are presumed not to be in excess of the arbitration limit unless a certification is filed in accordance with Local Civil Rule 83.7. An Arbitration Hearing will be scheduled after an Answer is filed. (RC)
July 25, 2023 CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (RC)
July 24, 2023 Filing 7 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SR)
July 24, 2023 Filing 6 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (SR)
July 24, 2023 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (SR)
July 24, 2023 Case Assigned to Judge Allyne R. Ross and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SR)
July 21, 2023 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Arch Specialty Insurance Company (Vilenchik, Vitaly)
July 21, 2023 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Arch Specialty Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Arch Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Arch Reinsurance Company, Corporate Parent Arch Capital Group, Ltd. for Arch Specialty Insurance Company. (Vilenchik, Vitaly)
July 21, 2023 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Arch Specialty Insurance Company (Vilenchik, Vitaly)
July 21, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KVA Electric, Inc., Minhas Construction Corp. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16917379 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Arch Specialty Insurance Company. (Vilenchik, Vitaly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arch Specialty Insurance Company v. Minhas Construction Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arch Specialty Insurance Company
Represented By: Vitaly Vilenchik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Minhas Construction Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KVA Electric, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?