Sakil v. Garland et al
Plaintiff: Sm Sakil
Defendant: US Attorney General Merrick Garland and USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou
Case Number: 1:2023cv05556
Filed: July 21, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Hector Gonzalez
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to the parties' stipulation of voluntary dismissal. See ECF No. #7 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 8/9/2023. (ICP)
August 8, 2023 Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice by Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou (Gates, Elizabeth)
July 27, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Gates on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Gates, Elizabeth)
July 26, 2023 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sm Sakil. Merrick Garland served on 7/26/2023, answer due 8/16/2023; Ur M. Jaddou served on 7/26/2023, answer due 8/16/2023. (Rahman, Mahfuzur)
July 26, 2023 Opinion or Order SCHEDULING ORDER: Defendants are directed to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before September 25, 2023. If Defendants intend to move to dismiss the complaint, then Defendants shall file by that date a pre-motion letter summarizing the basis for their motion to dismiss, as required by Section IV.A of the Court's Individual Practices. Plaintiff shall file a responsive letter on or before October 2, 2023. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 7/26/2023. (BH)
July 24, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (KD)
July 24, 2023 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD)
July 24, 2023 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD)
July 24, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER: Plaintiff shall file a letter no longer than three pages on or before August 11, 2023, describing Plaintiff's efforts to serve Plaintiff's complaint and a summons on each Defendant. If Plaintiff fails to file the letter required by this order, or if Plaintiff's letter demonstrates a lack of diligence in attempting service, then the Court is unlikely to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to complete service under Rule 4(m) in the absence of unusual circumstances demonstrating good cause.The Court will not extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file the letter required by this order unless Plaintiff requests an extension in accordance with Section I.D of the Court's Individual Practices. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 7/24/2023. (BH)
July 24, 2023 Case Assigned to Judge Hector Gonzalez. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD)
July 21, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16917932 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Sm Sakil. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Orders, Immigration Judge Hon. Lena Gloving, New York, NY, #4 Exhibit Form I-797C, Notice of Action of I-485, #5 Exhibit Current Case Status Form, #6 Exhibit Form I-797C, Notice of Action of I-730, #7 Exhibit Current Case Status of I-730, #8 Exhibit Form I-797C, Notice of Action of I-730, #9 Exhibit Current Case Status of I-730, #10 Exhibit Form I-797C, Notice of Action of I-730, #11 Exhibit Current Case Status of I-730) (Rahman, Mahfuzur)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sakil v. Garland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sm Sakil
Represented By: Mahfuzur Rahman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Attorney General Merrick Garland
Represented By: Elizabeth Gates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou
Represented By: Elizabeth Gates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?