Rahman v. Renaud et al
| Mosiur Rahman |
| Tracy Renaud, Alejandro Mayorkas, National Benefits Center, US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10 and ABC Agency 1-10 |
| 1:2023cv05558 |
| July 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Nina R Morrison |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice by Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, National Benefits Center, Tracy Renaud (Territola, Toniann) |
ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to the terms of the parties' #6 stipulation of dismissal. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 8/24/2023. (BC)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Toniann Territola on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, National Benefits Center, Tracy Renaud (aty to be noticed) (Territola, Toniann) |
|
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and Electronic Service upon the US Attorneys Office. The United States Attorney, as attorney for Respondents, shall show cause before this Court why a writ of mandamus should not be issued by filing of a return to the petition. Within sixty (60) days of this Order, the United States Attorney shall serve a copy of their return on Petitioner and shall file the original thereof, with proof of service, with the Clerk of the Court; Petitioner shall file a reply, if any, with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of receiving the return, and serve a copy on Respondents; Electronic service of this Order shall be made by the Clerk of the Court by forwarding a copy hereof, together with a copy of the petition, to the United States Attorney without prepayment of fees. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 7/25/2023. (BC)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, National Benefits Center, Tracy Renaud, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (KD) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Nina R. Morrison. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Writ of Mandamus against ABC Agency 1-10, Merrick B. Garland, Jane Does 1-10, John Does 1-10, Alejandro Mayorkas, National Benefits Center, Tracy Renaud filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16918072, filed by Mosiur Rahman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Gharti-Chhetry, Khagendra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
