Al-Amri v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Najla Ahmed Mohammed Al-Amri |
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, New York Asylum Office, Alejandro Mayorkas, USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou, Andrew Davidson, Associate Director Ted Kim, Patricia Menges and Matthew D. Emrich |
1:2023cv05602 |
July 25, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Carol Bagley Amon |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Najla Ahmed Mohammed Al-Amri. Andrew Davidson served on 8/7/2023, answer due 10/6/2023; Matthew D. Emrich served on 8/7/2023, answer due 10/6/2023; Ur M. Jaddou served on 8/7/2023, answer due 10/6/2023; Ted Kim served on 8/7/2023, answer due 10/6/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 8/7/2023, answer due 10/6/2023; Patricia Menges served on 8/7/2023, answer due 10/6/2023; New York Asylum Office served on 8/7/2023, answer due 10/6/2023; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 8/7/2023, answer due 10/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Certificate of Service, #5 Certificate of Service, #6 Certificate of Service, #7 Certificate of Service) (Ahmad, Naz) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher D. Volpe on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Volpe, Christopher) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Mudassar Hayat Toppa on behalf of Najla Ahmed Mohammed Al-Amri (aty to be noticed) (Toppa, Mudassar) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Andrew Davidson, Matthew D. Emrich, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted Kim, Alejandro Mayorkas, Patricia Menges, New York Asylum Office, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (KD) |
Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Davidson, Matthew D. Emrich, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted Kim, Alejandro Mayorkas, Patricia Menges, New York Asylum Office, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16925118 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Najla Ahmed Mohammed Al-Amri. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Ahmad, Naz) |
Case Assigned to Judge Carol Bagley Amon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.