Securities and Exchange Commission v. Schueler et al
| Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Richard J Schueler, Richard Heart, Hex, PulseChain and PulseX |
| 1:2023cv05749 |
| July 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Carol Bagley Amon |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference will be held by telephone in this case on November 28, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. before Peggy Kuo, United States Magistrate Judge. All counsel are required to attend. The parties are directed to call toll free (877) 336-1274 and input the Access Code 1453850 at the time of the Conference. Once all parties are on the line, the call will be connected. (The parties are reminded that, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.8, they may not independently record any court proceedings. A transcript of the proceedings may be ordered from the Clerk's Office.)Counsel are directed to the annexed Initial Conference Order for instructions. By November 22, 2023, the parties must file a joint and completed copy of the Proposed Discovery Plan, a PDF version of which may be found at: # https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/PK-discovplan.pdf Any request for adjournment of this or any other conference must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether or not all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least two (2) business days before the scheduled conference, except in the event of an emergency. Counsel with knowledge and authority must be present. Per diem counsel may not appear without prior permission of the Court. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that Defendants are aware of this conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 8/8/2023. (RO)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Gulde on behalf of Securities and Exchange Commission (notification declined or already on case) (Gulde, Matthew) |
|
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Matthew Gulde is permitted to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiff. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 8/1/2023. (RO)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Securities and Exchange Commission re #3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice , Order on Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice,, Notarized Affidavit of Matthew J. Gulde (Gulde, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SR) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (SR) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (SR) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit In Support of Motion to Admit Counsel Pro Hac Vice, #2 Proposed Order) (Gulde, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet, by Securities and Exchange Commission (Gulde, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Gulde, Matthew) |
| NOTICE: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Civil Cover Sheet was not filled out correctly - The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed 2 Page Form Civil Cover Sheet. Please resubmit a COMPLETED Civil Cover Sheet including the SECOND PAGE (Not the Instruction Page). This event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet (SR) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Carol Bagley Amon and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Motions referred to Peggy Kuo. (SR) |
|
ORDER deferring ruling on #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Affidavit must be notarized in order to comply with Local Rule 1.3. Counsel is directed to use the event titled "Notice Other" on ECF to file the revised notarized affidavit. A PDF version of which may be found at: # https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/NGProHacViceAffidavit.pdf . Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 7/31/2023. (RO)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
