Burke v. Exactech, Inc. et al
| Holiday Burke |
| Exactech, Inc. and Exactech US, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv05784 |
| July 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Nicholas G Garaufis |
| Marcia M Henry |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 APPROVAL re #8 Motion for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically. Signed Brenna B. Mahoney, Clerk of Court by Tiffeny Lee-Harris, Case Administration Manager on 9/15/2023. (fwd'd for processing) (TLH) |
| Filing 8 Letter MOTION for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically by Holiday Burke. (Mooneyham, Joe) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Holiday Burke. Exactech US, Inc. served on 8/18/2023, answer due 9/8/2023; Exactech, Inc. served on 8/18/2023, answer due 9/8/2023. (Mooneyham, Joe) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Exactech US, Inc., Exactech, Inc. (EG) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (EG) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (EG) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet by Holiday Burke (Mooneyham, Joe) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Holiday Burke (Mooneyham, Joe) |
| Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed 2 Page Civil Cover Sheet. Please resubmit a Completed Second Page (Not the Instruction Page) Civil Cover Sheet. This event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (KD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Exactech, Inc., Exactech US, Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16966900 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Holiday Burke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit Attachment A List of Defendants) (Mooneyham, Joe) |
| Incorrect Case/Document/Entry Information. NOTICE: Please file the Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Proposed Summon and pay the Civil Filing Fee for the following case so that it may be processed. Initial Case Opening Documents Should be Filed At The Time a Case Number is generated! (KD) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis and Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (EG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
