Lu v. Bank of America, N.A.
| Wendy Wenqin Lu |
| Bank Of America, N.A. |
| 1:2023cv06031 |
| August 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Hector Gonzalez |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #7 Amended Complaint. Defendant is directed to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint by November 1, 2023. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 10/5/2023. (JN)
|
| Filing 11 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #7 Amended Complaint by Bank Of America, N.A.. (Massand, Shan) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wendy Wenqin Lu. Bank Of America, N.A. served on 9/11/2023, answer due 10/2/2023. (Morel, Ricardo) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Bank Of America, N.A. (EG) |
| Filing 8 Proposed Summons. by Wendy Lu (Morel, Ricardo) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bank Of America, N.A., filed by Wendy Lu. (Morel, Ricardo) |
|
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Joint Civil Case Management Plan. The Court grants Plaintiff's request to file an amended complaint, ECF No. [6-1], and is directed to file it under separate docket entry. Counsel for all parties are further directed to file on the docket a joint letter describing the case and a completed civil case management plan by October 16, 2023, in accordance with the Court's August 11, 2023 Scheduling Order, see ECF No. #4 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 9/1/2023. (JN)
|
| Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Joint Civil Case Management Plan, First MOTION to Amend/Correct/Supplement #4 Scheduling Order, #1 Complaint, by Wendy Lu. (Attachments: #1 Proposed First Amended Complaint) (Morel, Ricardo) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ricardo R. Morel on behalf of Wendy Lu (aty to be noticed) (Morel, Ricardo) |
|
Filing 4
SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to file on the docket a joint letter describing the case and a completed civil case management plan by September 25, 2023, as further described in the attached mandatory requirements. Requests for adjournment of the deadline for these submissions will be considered only if made in writing and otherwise in accordance with Section I.D of the Court's Individual Practices. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 8/11/2023. (JN)
|
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Hector Gonzalez. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
| NOTICE re #3 Quality Control Check - Attorney Case Opening : Due to the amount of errors made when filing this case, Plaintiff counsel is advised to refer to the Attorney Case Opening Video Tutorial/Manual before filing another case electronically. (KD) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: The CLERK OF COURT NAME needs to be updated/corrected. Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (KD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WENDY LU filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16976638 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by WENDY LU. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Muniz, Jose) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/10/2023) (KD). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/10/2023: #2 Proposed Summons) (KD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lu v. Bank of America, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Wendy Wenqin Lu | |
| Represented By: | Ricardo R. Morel |
| Represented By: | Jose A. Muniz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bank Of America, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Shan P. Massand |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
