Palacios v. Farm Boy Market Inc. et al
| Ruperto Palacios |
| Farm Boy Market Inc. doing business as Key Food and Jae Woo Park |
| 1:2023cv06073 |
| August 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Pamela K Chen |
| Cheryl L Pollak |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference is set for 10/31/2023 @ 10:15 AM before Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. Initial conference will proceed via AT&T conference call. Please dial 877-336-1839 at 10:15 AM. Enter Access code: 380-1746 and security code: 23-6073. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 9/14/2023. (DC)
|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by All Defendants. (Lee, Diane) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ruperto Palacios. Jae Woo Park (John Doe-co-worker) served on 9/4/2023; answer due 9/25/2023. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit JOHN DOE (REFUSED FULL NAME), CO-WORKER) (Avshalumov, Roman). Modified on 9/12/2023 to add information- date deft. served and answer due. (ML). |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ruperto Palacios. Farm Boy Market Inc. served on 8/23/2023, answer due 9/13/2023. (Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Diane Hwakyung Lee on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Lee, Diane) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Farm Boy Market Inc., Jae Woo Park. (KD) |
| Filing 7 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
| Filing 6 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Avraham Y. Scher on behalf of Ruperto Palacios (aty to be noticed) (Scher, Avraham) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by James Patrick Peter O'Donnell on behalf of Ruperto Palacios (aty to be noticed) (O'Donnell, James) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, #2 Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet by Ruperto Palacios (Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint by Ruperto Palacios (Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Farm Boy Market Inc., Jae Woo Park filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16983162 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Ruperto Palacios. (Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
