Fandal v. The City of New York et al
| Joseph Fandal |
| The City of New York, New York City Police Department, P.O. Nicholas Toscano, P.O. Thelston J Rose and P.O. Anthony R Correia |
| 1:2023cv06175 |
| August 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Hector Gonzalez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by The City of New York. (Stavridis, Steve) |
ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. All Defendants shall file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before November 6, 2023. However, the parties' deadline to file the joint letter and case management plan required by the Court's prior scheduling order, see ECF No. #12 , remains October 16, 2023, because the Court does not need Defendants' answer to set a discovery schedule. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 10/3/2023. (ICP)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Steve Stavridis on behalf of The City of New York (aty to be noticed) (Stavridis, Steve) |
|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to file on the docket a joint letter describing the case and a completed civil case management plan by October 16, 2023, as further described in the attached mandatory requirements. Requests for adjournment of the deadline for these submissions will be considered only if made in writing and otherwise in accordance with Section I.D of the Court's Individual Practices. Plaintiff's counsel shall notify Defendants' counsel of this scheduling order, in writing, as soon as reasonably possible.Although the Court will be amenable to a reasonable extension of Defendants' deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint, the Court will require the parties to demonstrate additional good cause to adjourn the deadline for filing the joint letter and proposed case management plan required by this order because the Court does not need Defendants' answer to set a discovery schedule. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 8/31/2023. (ICP)
|
| Filing 11 Letter in Response to ECF Notice Concerning Service Upon Defendants by Joseph Fandal (Glaser, Ezra) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joseph Fandal. P.O. Thelston J Rose served on 8/23/2023, answer due 9/13/2023. (Glaser, Ezra) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joseph Fandal. P.O. Anthony R Correia served on 8/23/2023, answer due 9/13/2023. (Glaser, Ezra) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joseph Fandal. P.O. Nicholas Toscano served on 8/23/2023, answer due 9/13/2023. (Glaser, Ezra) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joseph Fandal. The City of New York served on 8/24/2023, answer due 9/14/2023. (Glaser, Ezra) |
|
ORDER: Plaintiff shall file a letter no longer than three pages on or before September 7, 2023. describing Plaintiff's efforts to serve Plaintiff's complaint and a summons on each Defendant. If Plaintiff fails to file the letter required by this order, or if Plaintiff's letter demonstrates a lack of diligence in attempting service, then the Court is unlikely to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to complete service under Rule 4(m) in the absence of unusual circumstances demonstrating good cause. The Court will not extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file the letter required by this order unless Plaintiff requests an extension in accordance with Section I.D of the Court's Individual Practices. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 8/18/2023. (ICP)
|
| Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SR) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (SR) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (SR) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Hector Gonzalez. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SR) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Joseph Fandal (Glaser, Ezra) |
| Filing 2 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Joseph Fandal as to All Defendants. (Glaser, Ezra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Joseph Fandal against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16997795 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Joseph Fandal. (Glaser, Ezra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
