Forte v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Monish Forte
Defendant: Uber Technologies Inc. and Uber USA, LLC
Case Number: 1:2023cv06662
Filed: September 7, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Orelia E Merchant
Referring Judge: Cheryl L Pollak
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2023 Filing 10 Letter Requesting Adjournment of Conference by Uber Technologies Inc., Uber USA, LLC (Hemway, Michael)
October 25, 2023 Opinion or Order SCHEDULING ORDER re #10 : Request granted. Initial Conference is adjourned to 12/20/2023 @ 10:15 AM before Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. Initial conference will proceed via AT&T conference call. Please dial 877-336-1839 at 10:15 AM. Enter Access code: 380-1746 and security code: 23-6662. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 10/25/2023. (DC)
October 12, 2023 Filing 9 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER by Uber Technologies Inc., Uber USA, LLC (Hemway, Michael)
October 12, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER TO ANSWER re #9 answer due 11/13/2023. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 10/12/2023. (DC)
October 10, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of email vozzalaw@verizon.net Once the filing has been made, you must login to www.pacer.gov and update your account. (Vozza, Joseph)
October 2, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Monish Forte. Uber USA, LLC served on 9/21/2023, answer due 10/12/2023. (Vozza, Joseph)
October 2, 2023 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Monish Forte. Uber Technologies Inc. served on 9/21/2023, answer due 10/12/2023. (Vozza, Joseph)
September 22, 2023 Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Monish Forte (Vozza, Joseph)
September 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference is set for 10/30/2023 @ 10:15 AM before Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. Initial conference will proceed via AT&T conference call. Please dial 877-336-1839 at 10:15 AM. Enter Access code: 380-1746 and security code: 23-6662. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 9/14/2023. (DC)
September 7, 2023 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (AF) (Main Document 3 replaced on 9/7/2023) (AF).
September 7, 2023 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (AF)
September 7, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Uber Technologies Inc., Uber USA, LLC from Supreme Court, State of New York, Kings County, case number 522883/2023. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-17061246) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Supplement Rule 7.1 Statement, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Hemway, Michael)
September 7, 2023 Case Assigned to Judge Orelia E. Merchant and Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (AF)
September 7, 2023 This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (AF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Forte v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Monish Forte
Represented By: Joseph Vozza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies Inc.
Represented By: Michael Joseph Hemway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber USA, LLC
Represented By: Michael Joseph Hemway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?