Carter v. The City of New York
| Irene Carter |
| The City of New York, The New York City Police Department, Andre C. Gaddy, John Doe 1-10 and Jane Doe 1-10 |
| 1:2023cv06785 |
| September 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Ramon E Reyes |
| Allyne R Ross |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Response to Complaint by 12/11/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. on 10/27/2023. (CG)
|
| Filing 8 REPLY in Opposition re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File answer or otherwise respond to complaint filed by Irene Carter. (Rubenstein, Joel) |
|
ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to respond by 10/26/2023 re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File answer or otherwise respond to complaint filed by The City of New York. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 10/23/2023. (MV)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File answer or otherwise respond to complaint by The City of New York. (Scharfstein, Susan) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Andre C. Gaddy, Jane Doe 1-10, John Doe 1-10, The City of New York, The New York City Police Department. (RG) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. by Irene Carter (Rubenstein, Joel) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: The name on the summons does not match the name as it appears on the complaint., Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. *Please note that the 81st pct is not listed as a dft on the complaint. (RG) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. by Irene Carter (Rubenstein, Joel) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Allyne R. Ross and Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: No summons provided, please submit summons. The event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet., Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (KD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17077566 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Irene Carter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet civil cover sheet) (Rubenstein, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
