Huo v. Gray et al
| Lina Huo |
| NY District Director Tamika Gray, US Attorney General Merrick Garland, Secretary of DHS Alejandro Mayorkas, NYAO Director Patricia Menges and USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou |
| 1:2023cv06800 |
| September 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Rachel P Kovner |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lina Huo. Merrick Garland served on 9/29/2023, answer due 11/28/2023; Tamika Gray served on 9/29/2023, answer due 11/28/2023; Ur M. Jaddou served on 9/29/2023, answer due 11/28/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 9/29/2023, answer due 11/28/2023; Patricia Menges served on 9/29/2023, answer due 11/28/2023. (Jia, Jason) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION - GENERIC on behalf of Merrick Garland, Tamika Gray, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Patricia Menges (aty to be noticed) (OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION - GENERIC, ) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Tamika Gray, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Patricia Menges, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (IH) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, Quality Control Check - Summons by Lina Huo (Jia, Jason) |
SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial conference will be held by telephone before Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 1/10/2024 at 11:00 AM. The parties are directed to call (888) 278-0296 and type in the access code 2012636 to join the conference. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 9/18/2023. (Miyamoto, Matthew) Modified on 9/18/2023 (TC).
|
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: The full case caption must appear on the summons. Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (KD) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rachel P. Kovner. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Merrick Garland, Tamika Gray, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Patricia Menges filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17079160 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Lina Huo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit Exhibits) (Jia, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
