Qiu v. Mayorkas et al
Plaintiff: Xing Chen Qiu
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Ted H. Kim
Case Number: 1:2023cv06833
Filed: September 14, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Diane Gujarati
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2023 Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal without Prejudice by Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Alejandro Mayorkas (Knapp, James)
November 6, 2023 Civil Case Terminated. (ECS)
October 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The United States Attorney, as attorney for Defendants, is directed to show cause on or before December 1, 2023, in writing, why a #1 Writ of Mandamus should not be issued, and shall serve a copy of the response on Plaintiff, with proof of such service to the Clerk of Court. On or before January 5, 2024, Plaintiff shall file a reply, if any, with proof of service to the Clerk of Court. Oral argument shall be heard on January 24, 2024 at 12:00 p.m. via teleconference before Judge Diane Gujarati. The call-in information for the telephone conference is 1-877-336-1839, and the access code is 2643682. The parties should call in to the telephone conference five minutes before the conference begins. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of any court proceeding or communication with the Court are prohibited. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions. A transcript of the proceedings may be ordered from the Clerk's Office. If any party has difficulty accessing the telephone conference, please contact chambers at Gujarati_Chambers@nyed.uscourts.gov. Ordered by Judge Diane Gujarati on 10/2/2023. (ECS)
September 27, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by James H. Knapp on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Knapp, James)
September 19, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Xing Chen Qiu. Alejandro Mayorkas served on 9/19/2023, answer due 11/20/2023. (Lee, Corey)
September 19, 2023 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Xing Chen Qiu. Ted H. Kim served on 9/19/2023, answer due 11/20/2023. (Lee, Corey)
September 19, 2023 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Xing Chen Qiu. Ur M. Jaddou served on 9/19/2023, answer due 11/20/2023. (Lee, Corey)
September 18, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (KD)
September 18, 2023 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD)
September 18, 2023 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD)
September 18, 2023 Case Assigned to Judge Diane Gujarati. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD)
September 14, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17085212 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Xing Chen Qiu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Lee, Corey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Qiu v. Mayorkas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Xing Chen Qiu
Represented By: Corey T Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: James H. Knapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur M. Jaddou
Represented By: James H. Knapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ted H. Kim
Represented By: James H. Knapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?