Howard v. The Retail Equation, Inc.
Plaintiff: Damany Howard
Defendant: The Retail Equation, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2023cv06856
Filed: September 15, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lois Bloom
Referring Judge: Allyne R Ross
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2023 Filing 7 Letter Response to Plaintiff's October 11, 2023 Letter by The Retail Equation, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Hayden v. The Retail Equation, Inc.) (DeFazio, Joseph)
October 20, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER: Defendant shall file any response to plaintiff's submission regarding the order to show cause #5 by October 30, 2023. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 10/20/2023. (GEC)
October 17, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Joseph L. Gentilcore shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that s/he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 10/17/2023. (EW)
October 16, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice / Motion of Joseph L. Gentilcore for Leave to Appear Pro hac vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-17185757 by Damany Howard. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit / Affidavit of Joseph L. Gentilcore in Support of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro hac vice, #2 Exhibit / Joseph L. Gentilcore - Certificate of Good Standing - New Jersey, #3 Exhibit / Joseph L. Gentilcore - Certificate of Good Standing - Pennsylvania) (Singer, Adam)
October 11, 2023 Filing 5 Letter / Plaintiff's letter in response to the Court's October 3, 2023, Order to Show Cause by Damany Howard (Singer, Adam)
October 3, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: To assist the Court in its review of this action, plaintiff is directed to submit a letter on or before October 11, 2023, responding to the following: 1. Does plaintiff claim any concrete, particularized injury in fact from the statutory violations alleged in the Amended Complaint? If so, please set forth such injury/injuries with particularity. 2. If plaintiff is not claiming any concrete injury, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Transunion LLC v. Ramirez, 141 S. Ct. 2190 (2021), plaintiff shall provide a basis for standing in this action or indicate whether the action should be dismissed. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 10/3/2023. (GEC) Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 10/3/2023. (GEC)
September 19, 2023 Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (CV)
September 19, 2023 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (CV)
September 19, 2023 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (CV)
September 19, 2023 Case Assigned to Judge Allyne R. Ross and Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (CV)
September 15, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Retail Equation, Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17088276 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Damany Howard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet - Proposed Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons - Proposed Summons: The Retail Equation, Inc.) (Singer, Adam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Howard v. The Retail Equation, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Damany Howard
Represented By: Adam Guttmann Singer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Retail Equation, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?