Garcia et al v. Satagaj et al
Plaintiff: Yasmin Astacio and Justin Ortiz Mccright
Defendant: CDR Insurance Group Inc.
Counter Defendant: Ashley Garcia
Counter Claimant: Michael Satagaj and Rogue 16 Freight Incorporated
Case Number: 1:2023cv06906
Filed: September 18, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Diane Gujarati
Referring Judge: Vera M Scanlon
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: An In-Person Initial Conference is scheduled for 12/13/2023 at 4:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon in Courtroom 13A South. The parties must complete the attached Joint Proposed Case Management Plan (CMP) and file it on ECF no later than 12/05/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 11/13/2023. (CC)
November 9, 2023 Filing 7 ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Ashley Garcia by Michael Satagaj, Rogue 16 Freight Incorporated. (Ibrahim, Nadine)
October 9, 2023 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Ashley Garcia, Justin Ortiz Mccright, Yasmin Astacio. (Attard, Cynthia)
October 9, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Cynthia M Attard on behalf of All Plaintiffs (notification declined or already on case) (Attard, Cynthia)
September 21, 2023 Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (CV)
September 21, 2023 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (CV)
September 21, 2023 This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (CV)
September 18, 2023 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CDR Insurance Group Inc., Rogue 16 Freight Incorporated, Michael Satagaj (Ibrahim, Nadine)
September 18, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CDR Insurance Group Inc., Rogue 16 Freight Incorporated, Michael Satagaj from Supreme/Kings, case number 507092/2023. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-17093363) (Attachments: #1 Petition of removal, #2 Exhibit Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit Answer to verified complaints, #4 Exhibit Response to demands, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Jury Demand) (Ibrahim, Nadine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garcia et al v. Satagaj et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Ashley Garcia
Represented By: Cynthia M Attard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yasmin Astacio
Represented By: Cynthia M Attard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Justin Ortiz Mccright
Represented By: Cynthia M Attard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Michael Satagaj
Represented By: Nadine Ibrahim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Rogue 16 Freight Incorporated
Represented By: Nadine Ibrahim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CDR Insurance Group Inc.
Represented By: Nadine Ibrahim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?