Sevigny v. Long Island Railroad Company
Barbara Sevigny |
Long Island Railroad Company |
1:2023cv07058 |
September 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Cheryl L Pollak |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MINUTE ENTRY for Initial Conference proceeding held before Magistrate Judge Cheryl Pollak on 11/14/2023. Appearance for Plaintiff: Sean Constable. Appearance for Defendant: Ronald Rizzo. Discovery schedule set: initial disclosures due by 11/17/2023. Parties to exchange document requests and interrogatories by 12/18/2023 - responses due 2/9/2024. Status Conference set for 2/15/2024 @ 10:15 AM. Conference will proceed via AT&T conference call. Please dial 877-336-1839 at 10:15 AM. Enter Access -code: 380-1746 and security code: 23-7058. (DC) |
Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judge, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (DC) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Sean P. Constable on behalf of Barbara Sevigny (aty to be noticed) (Constable, Sean) |
Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference is set for 11/14/2023 @ 3:15 PM before Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. Initial conference will proceed via AT&T conference call. Please dial 877-336-1839 at 3:15 PM. Enter Access code: 380-1746 and security code: 23-7058. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 11/1/2023. (DC) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Long Island Railroad Company. (Rizzo, Ronald) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Long Island Railroad Company identifying Corporate Parent Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Other Affiliate MTA New York City Transit, Other Affiliate MTA Staten Island Railway, Other Affiliate MTA Capital Construction, Other Affiliate MTA Bus Company, Other Affiliate MTA Bridges and Tunnels, Other Affiliate MTA Metro North Commuter Railroad for Long Island Railroad Company. (Rizzo, Ronald) |
Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Barbara Sevigny. (Wietzke, Marc) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Barbara Sevigny. Long Island Railroad Company waiver sent on 9/27/2023, answer due 11/27/2023. (Wietzke, Marc) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (AF) |
Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (AF) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (AF) |
Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (AF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Long Island Railroad Company filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17110618 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Barbara Sevigny. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons) (Wietzke, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sevigny v. Long Island Railroad Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Barbara Sevigny | |
Represented By: | Marc Wietzke |
Represented By: | Sean P. Constable |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Long Island Railroad Company | |
Represented By: | Ronald Rizzo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.