Chosen Figure LLC v. LaQuan Smith, LLC
| Chosen Figure LLC |
| LaQuan Smith, LLC |
| 1:2023cv07079 |
| September 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Rachel P Kovner |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT It appearing from the docket maintained in this action that defendant LaQuan Smith, LLC has failed to appear or otherwise defend this action, the default of defendant LaQuan Smith, LLC is hereby noted pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (JP) |
| Filing 11 Request for Certificate of Default by Chosen Figure LLC (Attachments: #1 Supplement Certificate of Default) (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 10 Request for Certificate of Default by Chosen Figure LLC (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Chosen Figure LLC (Sanders, Craig) |
ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to send a copy of the Complaint and Summons to defendant at the address listed in the #4 Summons Issued and file proof of service by November 3, 2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 10/31/2023. (RO)
|
| Filing 8 Notice of Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or appeal Regarding a Copyright. (Attachments: #1 complaint) (RC) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Chosen Figure LLC (Sanders, Craig) |
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference will be held in this case on January 26, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. before Peggy Kuo, United States Magistrate Judge in Courtroom 11C South of the United States Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York. Counsel are directed to the annexed Initial Conference Order for instructions. By January 19, 2024, the parties must file a joint and completed copy of the Proposed Discovery Plan, a PDF version of which may be found at: # https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/PK-discovplan.pdf Any request for adjournment of this or any other conference must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether or not all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least two (2) business days before the scheduled conference, except in the event of an emergency. Counsel with knowledge and authority must be present. Per diem counsel may not appear without prior permission of the Court. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that Defendant is aware of this conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 10/2/2023. (RO)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chosen Figure LLC. LaQuan Smith, LLC served on 10/2/2023, answer due 10/23/2023. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to LaQuan Smith, LLC. (AF) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (AF) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (AF) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rachel P. Kovner and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (AF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LaQuan Smith, LLC filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17112863, filed by Chosen Figure LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Photograph, #2 Exhibit Infringing Use of Photograph, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Supplement Report On The Filing Of An Action Regarding A Copyright, #6 Supplement Certificate Of Interested Parties) (Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chosen Figure LLC v. LaQuan Smith, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Chosen Figure LLC | |
| Represented By: | Craig B. Sanders |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LaQuan Smith, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
