Wang et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Jianxing WANG and Minguo HU |
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur Jaddou |
1:2023cv07572 |
October 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Lois Bloom |
Other Immigration Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jianxing Wang, Minguo Hu. Ur Jaddou served on 11/30/2023, answer due 12/21/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 11/30/2023, answer due 12/21/2023; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 11/29/2023, answer due 12/20/2023. (Cox, Theodore) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Philip R. DePaul on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (DePaul, Philip) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (MLR) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons. by Minguo Hu, Jianxing Wang (Cox, Theodore) |
Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. Please refer to ALL Corrections made on this case SPECIFICALLY THE OTHER SECTION ON THIS QC FORM! (KD) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (KD) |
Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: If multiple defendants, there must me a rider attached to the one (1)proposed summons with the name and addresses of all defendants included.Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (KD) |
Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17171615 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Jianxing WANG, Minguo HU. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons) (Cox, Theodore) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.