Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security
Bobby E. Roberts |
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
1:2023cv07783 |
October 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Diane Gujarati |
Peggy Kuo |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by Judge Diane Gujarati on 11/29/2023. (ECS) |
NOTICE to Assign District Judge: The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this case to a district judge. (RO) |
Case Assigned to Judge Diane Gujarati and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo no longer assigned as Presider to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (DA) |
Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. (BBM) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Commissioner of Social Security of Notice of Appearance (Dun Rappaport, Hugh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Hugh Dun Rappaport on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (aty to be noticed) (Dun Rappaport, Hugh) |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (KD) |
Notice: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case.No summons shall issue.(Notice mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff via US Mail). Commissioner of Social Security served on 10/20/2023, answer due 12/19/2023. (KD) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bobby E. Roberts. (KD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Bobby E. Roberts. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (KD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.