Stewart v. Garland et al
| Tyrone Stewart |
| US Attorney General Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Rob Mather and Christopher A. Wray |
| 1:2023cv07886 |
| October 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Sanket J Bulsara |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 jr Judicial Review |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Tyrone Stewart (Grauman, Scott) |
| Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed 2 Page Form Civil Cover Sheet. Please submit A Completed Civil Cover Sheet. This event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (KD) |
| Filing 1 First PETITION for Naturalization Hearing filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17208970, filed by Tyrone Stewart. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receipt for Application for naturalization, #2 Exhibit NY State Identification, #3 Exhibit Application for Naturalization, #4 Exhibit June 30, 2022 USCIS Decision, #5 Exhibit Incorrect Certificates of Disposition, #6 Exhibit Corrected Certificates of Disposition, #7 Exhibit September 28, 2022 USCIS Decision, #8 Exhibit Letter from NYC regarding termination of probation on July 14, 2018) (Grauman, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
