Ahmad v. State of New York City et al
Plaintiff: Nicholls Ahmad
Defendant: State of New York City and Police Department 69th Precinct
Case Number: 1:2023cv07957
Filed: October 25, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Cheryl L Pollak
Referring Judge: Ramon E Reyes
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2023 Case Reassigned to District Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Judge Orelia E. Merchant no longer assigned to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (AM)
November 29, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT FILING, litigant notified of deficiency(s) that must be corrected within fourteen (14) days. re #9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (JVC)
November 20, 2023 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Nicholls Ahmad. (JVC)
November 3, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT FILING, litigant notified of deficiency(s) that must be corrected within fourteen (14) days. (c/m to pro se on 11/3/23) (TLH)
November 3, 2023 NOTICE to Assign District Judge: The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this case to a district judge. (CH)
November 3, 2023 Case Reassigned to Judge Orelia E. Merchant. Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak no longer assigned to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (DA)
November 3, 2023 Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (DA)
October 25, 2023 Filing 7 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (CV) Modified on 10/25/2023 (CV).
October 25, 2023 Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 1:23-cv-08626. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. Modified on 10/25/2023 (CV).
October 25, 2023 The case of Ahmad v. State of New York City et al, has been transferred from Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. The new case number is 23-7957. PLEASE NOTE: if you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (CV)
October 17, 2023 MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 4. Mailed to: Nicholls Ahmad 895-20-00760 O.B.C.C. 1600 Hazen Street East Elmhurst, NY 11370. (nb) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/25/2023.]
October 13, 2023 CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Eastern District of New York. (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/25/2023.]
October 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 TRANSFER ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court. This order closes this case. The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 10/13/2023) (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/25/2023.] Modified on 10/25/2023 (CV).
October 13, 2023 Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court. Transmitted re: 4 Order, to the Office of the Clerk of Court for processing. (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/25/2023.]
October 10, 2023 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (nb) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/25/2023.]
September 29, 2023 Filing 3 PRISONER AUTHORIZATION. Document filed by Nicholls Ahmad..(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/25/2023.]
September 29, 2023 Filing 2 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Nicholls Ahmad..(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/25/2023.]
September 29, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Police Department 69th Precinct, State of New York City. Document filed by Nicholls Ahmad..(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/25/2023.]
September 29, 2023 Case Designated ECF. (rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/25/2023.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ahmad v. State of New York City et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicholls Ahmad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of New York City
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Police Department 69th Precinct
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?