Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
Norvell Sheldon Smith |
Commissioner of Social Security, Nancy A. Berryhill and Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
1:2023cv08015 |
October 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Vera M Scanlon |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSCRIPT (Social Security Appeal) Part 2 (Williams, Morris) |
Filing 14 ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSCRIPT (Social Security Appeal) Part 1 (Williams, Morris) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Morris Williams, III on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (aty to be noticed) (Williams, Morris) |
Filing 12 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (KD) |
Filing 11 Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 1:23-cv-07682. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
The case of Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security, has been transferred from Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. The new case number is 23-cv-8015. PLEASE NOTE: if you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (KD) |
|
Filing 9 JOINT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time addressed to Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker from Nahid Sorooshyari dated October 26, 2023. Document filed by Commissioner of Social Security..(Sorooshyari, Nahid) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/27/2023.] |
Filing 8 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Commissioner of Social Security..(Sorooshyari, Nahid) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/27/2023.] |
Filing 7 JOINT LETTER addressed to Judge Jennifer L. Rochon from Nahid Sorooshyari dated September 11, 2023 re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Consent. Document filed by Commissioner of Social Security..(Sorooshyari, Nahid) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/27/2023.] |
|
|
Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Nahid Sorooshyari on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security..(Sorooshyari, Nahid) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/27/2023.] |
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jennifer L. Rochon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/27/2023.] |
Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/27/2023.] |
Case Designated ECF. (pc) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/27/2023.] |
NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACTION. The Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York are hereby notified of the commencement of this action. Electronic Certified Administrative Record due by 10/30/2023..(pc) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/27/2023.] |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Fishman, Daniel) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/27/2023.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28214639)Document filed by Norvell Sheldon Smith..(Fishman, Daniel) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/27/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.