Xie Xie v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
An Zhen Diana Xie Xie |
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur M. Jaddou, United States Department of Homeland Security and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
1:2023cv08205 |
November 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Margo K Brodie |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Toniann Territola on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Territola, Toniann) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (CV) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (CV) (Main Document 4 replaced on 11/7/2023) (CV). |
Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by An Zhen Diana Xie Xie (Cuccia, Edward) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by An Zhen Diana Xie Xie (Cuccia, Edward) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Complaint in the Nature of Mandamus against Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17250832 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by An Zhen Diana Xie Xie. (Cuccia, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.