Waseem et al v. Mayorkas et al
| Aqsa Waseem and Abdul Rehman |
| Secretary of DHS Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, USCIS Director, Secretary of State Anthony J. Blinken and US Attorney General B Merrick Garland |
| 1:2023cv08269 |
| November 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Sanket J Bulsara |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, USCIS Director. (CV) |
| Filing 9 Proposed Summons. by Abdul Rehman, Aqsa Waseem (Tenreiro, George) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Anthony J. Blinken, B Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas. (Attachments: #1 Garland, #2 Blinken) (CV) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Summons. by Abdul Rehman, Aqsa Waseem (Tenreiro, George) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. by Abdul Rehman, Aqsa Waseem (Tenreiro, George) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. by Abdul Rehman, Aqsa Waseem (Tenreiro, George) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. by Abdul Rehman, Aqsa Waseem (Tenreiro, George) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (CV) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (CV) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Writ of Mandamus against Anthony J. Blinken, B Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, USCIS Director filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17260018 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Abdul Rehman, Aqsa Waseem. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Civil Cover Sheet) (Tenreiro, George) (Attachment 11 replaced on 11/7/2023) (CV). |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: No summons provided, please submit summons. The event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet., Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (CV) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
