Falvey Cargo Underwriting, Ltd. et al v. Cathay Pacific Airways Limited
| Falvey Cargo Underwriting, Ltd. and Certain Interested Underwriters Subscribing to Policy No. FAL-12000070 |
| Cathay Pacific Airways Limited |
| 1:2023cv08271 |
| November 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Nicholas G Garaufis |
| Vera M Scanlon |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: A Telephonic Initial Conference is set for 3/5/2024 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. The parties are to dial 877-336-1829 and enter the access code 3581283 for the AT&T conference bridge.The parties must complete the attached Joint Proposed Case Management Plan (CMP) and file it on ECF no later than 2/20/2024. In the event that any Defendant has not answered or otherwise appeared, Plaintiffs must also mail a copy of this Order, its attachment and the full docket to the last known mailing address for such Defendant and file proof on ECF by the CMP filing date. As to any LLC, the Court further directs such party to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 within 30 days of appearing in this action. The disclosure statement should identify all of the members and their respective citizenship. See Barnes v. Fort Hamilton Family Homes, 524 F. Supp. 3d 40, 42 (E.D.N.Y. 2021) ("For diversity purposes, LLCs have the imputed citizenship of each of their members."). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 12/11/2023. (GS)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Cathay Pacific Airways Limited. (KD) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (KD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cathay Pacific Airways Limited filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17260352 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Falvey Cargo Underwriting, Ltd., Certain Interested Underwriters Subscribing to Policy No. FAL-12000070. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Heilig, Justin) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
