Mahadeo v. Garland et al
| Tulyah Mahadeo |
| Merrick Garland, Ur Jadhou, Quarantillo Andrea, Mayorkas Alejandro, Connie Nolan, Andrea Quarantillo and Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 1:2023cv08299 |
| November 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Hector Gonzalez |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary McGarvey-DePuy on behalf of Merrick Garland, Ur Jadhou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan, Andrea Quarantillo (aty to be noticed) (McGarvey-DePuy, Mary) |
| Filing 5 Letter Response to Order by Tulyah Mahadeo (Mundy, Nicholas) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tulyah Mahadeo. Merrick Garland served on 11/15/2023, answer due 12/6/2023; Ur Jadhou served on 11/15/2023, answer due 12/6/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 11/15/2023, answer due 12/6/2023; Connie Nolan served on 11/15/2023, answer due 12/6/2023; Andrea Quarantillo served on 11/15/2023, answer due 12/6/2023. (Mundy, Nicholas) |
SCHEDULING ORDER: Defendants are directed to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before January 16, 2024. If Defendants intend to move to dismiss the complaint, then Defendants shall file by that date a pre-motion letter summarizing the basis for their motion to dismiss, as required by Section IV.A of the Court's Individual Practices. Plaintiff shall file a responsive letter on or before January 23, 2024. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 11/16/2023. (BH)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Ur Jadhou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan, Andrea Quarantillo, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (JVC) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. by Tulyah Mahadeo (Mundy, Nicholas) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Hector Gonzalez. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (AF) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: The full case caption must appear on the summons., Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (AF) |
|
ORDER: Plaintiff shall file a letter no longer than three pages on or before November 29, 2023, describing Plaintiff's efforts to serve Plaintiff's complaint and a summons on each Defendant. If Plaintiff fails to file the letter required by this order, or if Plaintiff's letter demonstrates a lack of diligence in attempting service, then the Court is unlikely to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to complete service under Rule 4(m) in the absence of unusual circumstances demonstrating good cause.The Court will not extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file the letter required by this order unless Plaintiff requests an extension in accordance with Section I.D of the Court's Individual Practices. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 11/9/2023. (BH)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mayorkas Alejandro, Quarantillo Andrea, Merrick Garland, Ur Jadhou, Connie Nolan filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17265440 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Tulyah Mahadeo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A - Filing Receipt, #2 Exhibit Ex B - Reopen Notice, #3 Exhibit Ex C - Inquiries & Demands, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons) (Mundy, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
