Zeng v. Mayorkas et al
| Jin Ya Zeng |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Tracy Renaud |
| 1:2023cv08489 |
| November 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Vera M Scanlon |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER. In view of the stipulation of dismissal at #7 , the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 1/3/2024. (JR)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice by Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud (Canter, Nancy) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nancy K Canter on behalf of Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud (aty to be noticed) (Canter, Nancy) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION - GENERIC on behalf of Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud (aty to be noticed) (OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION - GENERIC, ) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (IH) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Jin Ya Zeng (Chin, Mo) (Main Document 3 replaced on 11/27/2023) (IH). |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (AF) |
| Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (AF) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: Did not use the correct Summons form AO 440 Rev 6/12. Please use summons with updated Clerk of Court. Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (AF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT MANDAMUS ZENG, Jin Ya against Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17286768 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Jin Ya Zeng. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Chin, Mo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
