Cameron v. Prosegur Services Group, Inc.
| Dale Cameron |
| Prosegur Services Group, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv08789 |
| November 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Dora Lizette Irizarry |
| Taryn A Merkl |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Prosegur Services Group, Inc. (Suess, Benjamin) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Suess on behalf of Prosegur Services Group, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Suess, Benjamin) |
ORDER denying #8 Motion for Pre Motion Conference and Order to Show Cause -- Show Cause Response Due 02/02/2024 -- Defendant's motion for a premotion conference is denied as unnecessary. As an initial matter, with respect to the request for leave to move for admission pro hac vice, a premotion conference is not necessary. The pertinent party shall file the motion consistent with the Court's Local Rule 1.3(c), which motion is automatically referred to the magistrate judge assigned to this case. See, Judge Irizarry's Individual Rules and Practices Section III.(A)(5).As to the proposed motion to transfer venue of this case to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ("SDNY") so that it may be consolidated with the related case filed there sub nom Frattarola et al., v. ProsegurSecurity USA Inc., Case Docket No. 7:23-cv-00137 (CS), no premotion conference is necessary. The premotion conference request is deemed the motion to transfer venue. Plaintiff hereby is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE BY NO LATER THAN FEBRUARY 2, 2024 in a letter of no more than five pages why this case should not be transferred to the SDNY. The parties are reminded that they must forward to chambers hard copies of their filings immediately upon filing. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 1/25/2024. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
| Filing 8 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by Prosegur Services Group, Inc.. (Schrader, David) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Prosegur Services Group, Inc.. (Schrader, David) |
| Filing 6 STATUS REPORT by Dale Cameron (Hassan, Abdul) |
|
ORDER: Plaintiff filed the Complaint on 11/29/2023 and filed proof service on 12/4/2023, indicating that Defendant was served on 12/1/2023 with an answer due 12/25/2023. To date, Defendant has not answered or otherwise responded to the Complaint. Defendants are directed to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint by 1/24/2024. Plaintiff is directed to provide a copy of this Order to Defendants forthwith and to provide proof of same by 1/10/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl on 1/3/2024. (ALG)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dale Cameron. Prosegur Services Group, Inc. served on 12/1/2023, answer due 12/25/2023. (Hassan, Abdul) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Prosegur Services Group, Inc.. (AF) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (AF) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (AF) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry and Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (AF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Prosegur Services Group, Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17329480 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Dale Cameron. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Hassan, Abdul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cameron v. Prosegur Services Group, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dale Cameron | |
| Represented By: | Abdul Karim Hassan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Prosegur Services Group, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Suess |
| Represented By: | David A,. Schrader |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
