Zhang v. Garland et al
| Haiyun Zhang |
| US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, David L. Neal and Rafael Fernandez |
| 1:2023cv08916 |
| December 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Dora Lizette Irizarry |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER DISMISSING CASE per #6 . So Ordered by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 12/19/2023. (CC)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice by Rafael Fernandez, Merrick B. Garland, David L. Neal (Lipari, Vincent) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Vincent Lipari on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Lipari, Vincent) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Rafael Fernandez, Merrick B. Garland, David L. Neal. (CV) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (CV) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Meer Md. Mizanur Rahman on behalf of Haiyun Zhang (notification declined or already on case) (Rahman, Meer Md.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR MANDAMUS against Rafael Fernandez, Merrick B. Garland, David L. Neal filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17343847 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Haiyun Zhang. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Rahman, Meer Md.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
