Watson v. City of New York et al
Korey Watson |
City of New York, FJC Security Services, Inc. and John and Jane Does 1-7 |
1:2023cv08975 |
December 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
LaShann DeArcy Hall |
Taryn A Merkl |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by FJC Security Services, Inc.. (Wodarski, Joseph) |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by FJC Security Services, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE, LLC d/b/a ALLIED UNIVERSAL, a Delaware limited liability company for FJC Security Services, Inc.. (Wodarski, Joseph) |
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Defendant FJC Security Services, Inc.'s request for an extension of time to answer #9 and Defendant City of New York's motion for an extension of time to answer #10 . Both requests are GRANTED. Defendant FJC Security Services, Inc., shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by 1/22/2024. Defendant City of New York shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by 2/27/2024. The parties are respectfully reminded that any motion practice must be initiated in accordance with the Individual Rules of the assigned District Judge. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl on 12/27/2023. (ALG) |
Filing 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by City of New York. (Holohan, Kellyanne) |
Filing 9 Letter to Court by FJC Security Services, Inc. (Wodarski, Joseph) Modified on 12/27/2023 (ALG). |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Korey Watson. FJC Security Services, Inc. served on 12/8/2023, answer due 1/1/2024. (Oliver, Gideon) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Korey Watson. City of New York served on 12/7/2023, answer due 12/28/2023. (Oliver, Gideon) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Elena Louisa Cohen on behalf of Korey Watson (aty to be noticed) (Cohen, Elena) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to City of New York, John and Jane Does 1-7, FJC Security Services, Inc.. (CV) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (CV) |
Filing 3 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (CV) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. by Korey Watson (Oliver, Gideon) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of New York, John and Jane Does 1-7, FJC Security Services, Inc. filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17353443 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Korey Watson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Oliver, Gideon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.