Wen v. Blinken et al
| Ruhui Wen |
| Antony Blinken, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Gregory A Richardson and Thomas M Cioppa |
| 1:2023cv09113 |
| December 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Sanket J Bulsara |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Defendants shall provide a status update on Plaintiff's immigration application, including whether an interview has been scheduled, by 2/13/2024. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 1/30/2024. (MEG)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nancy K Canter on behalf of Antony Blinken, Thomas M Cioppa, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Gregory A Richardson (aty to be noticed) (Canter, Nancy) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION - GENERIC on behalf of Antony Blinken, Thomas M Cioppa, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Gregory A Richardson (aty to be noticed) (OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION - GENERIC, ) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, Thomas M Cioppa, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Gregory A Richardson, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (KD) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (KD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17370519 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Ruhui Wen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Exhibit biometrics notice, #4 Exhibit USCIS online case status, #5 Proposed Summons AO440 with address rider) (Schmidt, Curt) |
| Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
