Feldsher v. Makowenskyj et al
Ross Feldsher |
Michael Makowenskyj, Michael Mak, Parlor Games, LLC, Christopher Lazos, Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Boom Cups Holdings, LLC, Team Boom Cups, LLC, Mak Boom Cups, LLC, 1800 Liquors Holding Group, LLC, Celebrity Sports Entertainment, LLC, Mak 1800 Liquors, LLC and Anamae Merchants, LLC |
1:2023cv09191 |
December 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Sanket J Bulsara |
Securities/Commodities |
15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (Casagrande, David) |
Filing 23 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION re #18 Summons Issued by Ross Feldsher (Varbero, Anthony) |
ORDER: The Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer #22 is hereby granted. Defendant Oppenheimer & Co. must file an answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by 3/8/2024. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 2/2/2024. (AL) |
Filing 22 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.. (Gibson, Michael) |
Filing 21 SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic initial conference will be held at 2:00 P.M. on 2/09/2024 before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274. The access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the conference. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Rule 26(f) Report and electronically file same with the Court no later than 2/6/2024. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the Rule 26(f) Report, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. Upon receipt of this email counsel shall confirm with each other of the date and time of this telephonic initial conference. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 1/30/2024. (EM) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Walter Arthur Saurack on behalf of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Saurack, Walter) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Hugh Gibson on behalf of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Gibson, Michael) |
Filing 18 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (JT) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by David C. Casagrande on behalf of All Plaintiffs (aty to be noticed) (Casagrande, David) |
Filing 16 Proposed Summons.Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint by Ross Feldsher (Varbero, Anthony) |
Filing 15 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
Filing 14 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (KD) |
Filing 13 Proposed Summons. by Ross Feldsher (Varbero, Anthony) |
Filing 12 Proposed Summons. by Ross Feldsher (Varbero, Anthony) |
Filing 11 Proposed Summons. by Ross Feldsher (Varbero, Anthony) |
Filing 10 Proposed Summons. by Ross Feldsher (Varbero, Anthony) |
Filing 9 Proposed Summons. by Ross Feldsher (Varbero, Anthony) |
Filing 8 Proposed Summons. by Ross Feldsher (Varbero, Anthony) |
Filing 7 Proposed Summons. by Ross Feldsher (Varbero, Anthony) |
Filing 6 Proposed Summons. by Ross Feldsher (Varbero, Anthony) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons. by Ross Feldsher (Varbero, Anthony) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons. by Ross Feldsher (Varbero, Anthony) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. by Ross Feldsher (Varbero, Anthony) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Ross Feldsher (Varbero, Anthony) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17381340 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Ross Feldsher. (Varbero, Anthony) |
Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: If multiple defendants, there must me a rider attached to the One (1)Proposed summons with the name and addresses of all defendants included. Do not submit a proposed summon for each defendant.Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (KD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.