Dong v. Mayorkas et al
| Xingyu Dong |
| Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and Director Ur M Jaddou |
| 1:2023cv09224 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Allyne R Ross |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary McGarvey-DePuy on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (McGarvey-DePuy, Mary) |
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 12/27/2023. (GEC)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Xingyu Dong. Ur M Jaddou served on 12/18/2023, answer due 2/16/2024; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 12/18/2023, answer due 2/16/2024. (Altman, Stuart) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ur M Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas. (CV) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (CV) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Xingyu Dong against Ur M Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17385529 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Xingyu Dong. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit I-601A Receipt) (Altman, Stuart) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
