Taylor et al v. Procter & Gamble Company
Plaintiff: Joy Taylor and Anthony Coleman
Defendant: Procter & Gamble Company
Case Number: 1:2023cv09258
Filed: December 19, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Brian M Cogan
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2024 Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura S Dunning on behalf of Anthony Coleman, Darrell Wayne Grimsley, Jr., Joy Taylor (aty to be noticed) Associated Cases: 1:23-md-03089-BMC, 1:23-cv-09258-BMC, 1:23-cv-09265-BMC (Dunning, Laura)
January 26, 2024 Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter J Mougey on behalf of Anthony Coleman, Joy Taylor, Darrell Wayne Grimsley, Jr. (notification declined or already on case) Associated Cases: 1:23-md-03089-BMC, 1:23-cv-09258-BMC, 1:23-cv-09265-BMC (Mougey, Peter)
January 22, 2024 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #16 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that s/he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 1/22/2024. (PW)
January 16, 2024 Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura Flahive Wu on behalf of The Procter & Gamble Company (aty to be noticed) Associated Cases: 1:23-md-03089-BMC et al. (Flahive Wu, Laura)
January 10, 2024 Filing 16 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Motion to Admit Peter J. Mougey Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-17448534 by Anthony Coleman, Joy Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Peter J. Mougey, #2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (Mougey, Peter)
January 8, 2024 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #15 Laura S. Dunning's Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that she receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 1/8/2024. (PW)
January 5, 2024 Filing 15 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Motion to Admit Laura S. Dunning Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-17433835 by Anthony Coleman, Joy Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Laura Dunning, #2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (Dunning, Laura)
December 21, 2023 Filing 14 Case transferred in from District of California Northern; Case Number 3:23-cv-04909. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
December 19, 2023 Filing 13 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-1) by MDL Panel on 12/15/2023. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2023) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/21/2023.]
December 19, 2023 Case transferred to Eastern District of New York per CTO-1. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2023) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/21/2023.]
November 29, 2023 Filing 12 Case Reassigned to Judge Rita F. Lin. Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2023) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/21/2023.]
November 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE.IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to the Honorable Rita F. Lin in the San Francisco Division for all further proceedings.1. All future filings shall bear the initials RFL immediately after the case number.2. All case management conference dates are vacated and will be reset by the Court.3. All hearing dates presently scheduled are VACATED. However, existing briefing schedules for motions remain unchanged. All pending motions (regardless of whether they are presently scheduled for hearing) must be RENOTICED for hearing before Judge Lin by the moving party for a date consistent with the Courts law and motion calendar, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior briefing schedule.4. Deadlines for ADR compliance and discovery cutoffs remain unchanged.5. All pretrial conference and trial dates currently set for after March 4, 2024, and all other deadlines associated with the case, will remain in place unless otherwise ordered.6. All pretrial conference and trial dates scheduled on or before March 4, 2024, are vacated. Other pretrial deadlines (eg., motions in limine, pretrial statements, proposed joint trial exhibits, etc.) will remain in place. The Court will notify the parties when a status conference will be held to schedule a new pretrial conference and trial dates for affected cases.7. Matters currently referred to a Magistrate Judge will remain before that Magistrate Judge absent further notice.8. Each party is expected to review and become familiar with all applicable standing orders and scheduling notes.9. On or before December 11, 2023, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement (separate statements are appropriate if either party is proceeding without counsel). The statement should not exceed ten pages in length and should address the following items in the following order: a. Date Filed: The date the case was filed; b. Parties: A list or description of each party; c. Claims: A summary of all claims, counter-claims, cross-claims, or third party claims; d. Facts: A brief chronology of the facts and a statement of the principal factual issues in dispute; e. Legal Issues: A brief statement, without extended legal argument, of the disputed points of law, including reference to specific statutes and decisions; f. Relief: A description of the relief sought and the damages claimed with an explanation as to how damages have been (or will be) computed; g. Discovery: The status of discovery, including any significant discovery management issues, as well as any limits or cutoff dates; h. Related Cases: The status, case name, and case number of any related cases or proceedings pending before another judge of this court, or before another court or administrative body; i. Procedural History: A procedural history of the case, including any previous motions that were decided or submitted, any ADR proceedings or settlement conferences that have been scheduled or concluded, any appellate proceedings that are pending or concluded, and any previous referral to a magistrate judge; j. Deadlines: A description of any other deadlines in place before reassignment, including those for ADR, dispositive motions, pretrial conferences, and trials; k. Any modification of deadlines: Any requested modification of these dates, and the reasons for the request; l. Consent to Magistrate: Whether the parties will consent to a magistrate judge for trial; and m. Emergency: Whether there exists an immediate need for a case management conference to be scheduled in the action, and why the parties believe such a need exists.10. The Joint Case Management Statement will not constitute a motion to extend or modify dates. If emergency relief is needed to modify a deadline, and the deadline is not of the type that can be modified via stipulation of the parties without a court order, the requesting party or parties shall additionally file a motion or stipulation for such relief in compliance with Local Rule 6.11. The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. Hearings and trials in any civil case assigned to a judge participating in the Pilot Project are eligible for video recording, upon request and with the consent of the parties and the presiding judge. Please see the #Northern Districts webpage about participation in the Pilot Project and # General Order 65 for more information. IT IS SO ORDERED.Dated: 11/27/2023FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEMark B. Busby, Clerk of Court (kab-adi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2023) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/21/2023.]
October 24, 2023 Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT CLASS ACTION against Procter & Gamble Company. Filed by Joy Taylor, Anthony Coleman. (Pifko, Mark) (Filed on 10/24/2023) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/21/2023.]
September 26, 2023 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE RESCHEDULING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference is reset for 1/4/2024 at 1:30 p.m. before Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley by a Zoom webinar. Case Management Statement is due by 12/28/2023.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jsc Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names must be sent to the CRD at jsccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than noon on 1/3/2024.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2023) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/21/2023.]
September 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley for all further proceedings. Chief Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by The Clerk on 9/26/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2023) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/21/2023.]
September 26, 2023 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2023) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/21/2023.]
September 26, 2023 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Procter & Gamble Company. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2023) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/21/2023.]
September 26, 2023 Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Joy Taylor.. (Pifko, Mark) (Filed on 9/26/2023) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/21/2023.]
September 26, 2023 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Pifko, Mark) (Filed on 9/26/2023) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/21/2023.]
September 26, 2023 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/27/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/3/2024 01:30 PM. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2023) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/21/2023.]
September 26, 2023 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/10/2023. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2023) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/21/2023.]
September 26, 2023 #Electronic filing error. Filer is reminded NOT to enter parties' names in all capital letters. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #1 Complaint filed by Joy Taylor. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2023) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/21/2023.]
September 26, 2023 #Electronic filing error. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file the summons form completed with all the necessary information. Re:[1-2] Summons filed by Joy Taylor. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2023) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/21/2023.]
September 25, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18677320.). Filed byJOY TAYLOR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 * ERRONEOUS ENTRY - NEEDS TO RE-FILE * Summons)(Pifko, Mark) (Filed on 9/25/2023) Modified on 9/26/2023 (mcl, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from California Northern on 12/21/2023.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor et al v. Procter & Gamble Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joy Taylor
Represented By: Mark Philip Pifko
Represented By: Roland Tellis
Represented By: Laura S Dunning
Represented By: Peter J Mougey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Coleman
Represented By: Mark Philip Pifko
Represented By: Laura S Dunning
Represented By: Peter J Mougey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Procter & Gamble Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?