Prichard v. Long Island University
Plaintiff: Cecilia E Prichard
Defendant: Long Island University
Case Number: 1:2023cv09269
Filed: December 18, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lois Bloom
Referring Judge: Eric R Komitee
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2024 Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION for pre motion conference seeking permission to move to dismiss filed by Cecilia E Prichard. (Robinson, Brian)
February 8, 2024 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Response due by 2/9/2024. Ordered by Judge Eric R. Komitee on 2/8/2024. (APJ)
February 7, 2024 Filing 11 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #9 MOTION for pre motion conference seeking permission to move to dismiss by Cecilia E Prichard. (Robinson, Brian)
February 7, 2024 Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Physical addess, email address, phone number and fax number Once the filing has been made, you must login to www.pacer.gov and update your account. (Robinson, Brian)
February 6, 2024 Email Notification Test - DO NOT REPLY (MLR)
February 6, 2024 Email Notification Test - DO NOT REPLY. (MLR)
February 5, 2024 NOTICE -- Defendant Long Island University ("LIU") submitted a letter requesting a pre-motion conference on an anticipated motion to dismiss on February 1, 2024. Plaintiff's counsel is reminded that pursuant to Rule III.B.4 of Judge Komitee's # Individual Rules and Practices , plaintiffs are required to serve and file a letter response of three pages or less within five days of service of defendants' letter. (APJ)
February 1, 2024 Filing 9 MOTION for pre motion conference seeking permission to move to dismiss by Long Island University. (Toren, Stefanie)
January 16, 2024 Opinion or Order ORDER: Defendant requests, with plaintiff's consent, an extension of time to respond to plaintiff's complaint. ECF No. #8 . The request is granted. Defendant shall respond to the complaint by February 1, 2024. Any party seeking to file a dispositive motion shall consult Judge Komitee's Individual Rules. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 1/16/2024. (VP)
January 12, 2024 Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File a response to the complaint by Long Island University. (Sapp, Keegan)
January 12, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Keegan B. Sapp on behalf of Long Island University (aty to be noticed) (Sapp, Keegan)
December 20, 2023 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Long Island University. (AF)
December 20, 2023 Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (AF)
December 20, 2023 Filing 4 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (AF)
December 20, 2023 Case Assigned to Judge Eric R. Komitee and Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (AF)
December 19, 2023 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Cecilia E Prichard (Robinson, Brian)
December 19, 2023 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Cecilia E Prichard (Robinson, Brian)
December 18, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Long Island University filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17390002 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Cecilia E Prichard. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Charge of Discrimination, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B Right to Sue Letter) (Robinson, Brian)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Prichard v. Long Island University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cecilia E Prichard
Represented By: Brian K. Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Long Island University
Represented By: Stefanie Robin Toren
Represented By: Keegan B. Sapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?