Brik v. Stroutsovsky
| Roman Brik |
| Ilana Stroutsovsky |
| 1:2023cv09364 |
| December 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil Case Terminated. (DG) |
Filing 5
REMAND ORDER. Mr. Brik's motion for a stay is denied, and the Court remands the action to Richmond County Family Court action under Index Numbers 01268/20/20A and 01269/20/20A to the Richmond County Family Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). The Clerk of Court is directed to send a certified copy of this Order immediately to the Clerk of the Richmond County Family Court and to note service on the docket; to mail a copy of this Order to Mr. Brik, and to close this case.Mr. Brik is reminded that a court can impose restrictions on future access to the judicial system if a litigant has a history of filing vexatious, harassing or duplicative lawsuits. Hong Mai Sa v. Doe, 406 F.3d 155, 158 (2d Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (a)(3) that any in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 1/17/2024. (DG)
|
| Filing 4 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (CV) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Roman Brik. (CV) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Roman Brik. (CV) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Roman Brik from Richmond County Family Court, case number 41723, 41197. (CV) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/27/2023: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (CV). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brik v. Stroutsovsky | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Roman Brik | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ilana Stroutsovsky | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
