Hernandez v. Red Hook Tavern, LLC
| Timothy Hernandez |
| Red Hook Tavern, LLC |
| 1:2023cv09368 |
| December 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Dora Lizette Irizarry |
| Cheryl L Pollak |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1201 Civil Rights (Disability) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
STATUS REPORT ORDER: The plaintiff is Ordered to provide a status letter to this Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Status Report due by 3/7/2024. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 2/7/2024. (DC)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Timothy Hernandez. Red Hook Tavern, LLC served on 1/8/2024, answer due 1/29/2024. (Shaker, PeterPaul) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Red Hook Tavern, LLC. (AF) (Main Document 4 replaced on 12/26/2023) (AF). |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (AF) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (AF) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry and Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (AF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Timothy Hernandez against Red Hook Tavern, LLC filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17395820 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Timothy Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Shaker, PeterPaul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hernandez v. Red Hook Tavern, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Timothy Hernandez | |
| Represented By: | PeterPaul Elhamy Shaker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Red Hook Tavern, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
