Jaramillo et al v. BCG Glass Industry Inc. et al
| Ruben Jaramillo, Edgar Raul Zambrano and Juan Perez |
| BCG Glass Industry Inc. d/b/a BCG Windows, Shijin Wei and Richard Ally |
| 1:2024cv00005 |
| January 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Vera M Scanlon |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Richard Ally, BCG Glass Industry Inc., Shijin Wei. Richard Ally waiver sent on 1/11/2024, answer due 3/11/2024; BCG Glass Industry Inc. waiver sent on 1/11/2024, answer due 3/11/2024; Shijin Wei waiver sent on 1/11/2024, answer due 3/11/2024. (Yam, Kevin) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal (As To Defendant Shijin Wei) by Richard Ally, BCG Glass Industry Inc., Shijin Wei (Yam, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin K. Yam on behalf of Richard Ally, BCG Glass Industry Inc., Shijin Wei (aty to be noticed) (Yam, Kevin) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (CV) |
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (CV) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: NOTICE: Rider. The Rider must be attached to the proposed summon (Do not document separately) Please resubmit corrected Summons. This event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (CV) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Ruben Jaramillo, Juan Perez, Edgar Raul Zambrano (Attachments: #1 Supplement Rider - List of Defendants to Be Served) (Samuel, Michael) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Ruben Jaramillo, Juan Perez, Edgar Raul Zambrano (Samuel, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT COLLECTIVE ACTION against Richard Ally, BCG Glass Industry Inc., Shijin Wei filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17419167 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Ruben Jaramillo, Juan Perez, Edgar Raul Zambrano. (Samuel, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
