Doe v. Xi Fang Temple et al
| Jane Doe |
| Jun Du, Xi Fang Temple, Kuan Neng Shifu and Yun Xia Wang |
| 1:2024cv00059 |
| January 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Allyne R Ross |
| Vera M Scanlon |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 99 U.S.C. ยง 9999 Report cause code (DO NOT DELETE) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Electronically File Document under Seal by Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit A) (Kelly, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION in Support re #2 MOTION for Protective Order / Plaintiff Jane Does Notice Of Motion For Leave To Proceed Using A Pseudonym (Redacted) filed by Jane Doe. (Kelly, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM in Support re #2 MOTION for Protective Order / Plaintiff Jane Does Notice Of Motion For Leave To Proceed Using A Pseudonym (Redacted) filed by Jane Doe. (Kelly, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Protective Order / Plaintiff Jane Does Notice Of Motion For Leave To Proceed Using A Pseudonym by Jane Doe. (Kelly, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jun Du, Yun Xia Wang, Xi Fang Temple filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17426275 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons) (Kelly, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
