Paul v. Department of Labor
| Antonio Paul |
| Department of Labor |
| 1:2024cv00095 |
| January 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Natasha C Merle |
| Natasha C Merle |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Pro Se Consent to Electronic Notification by Antonio Paul. (JP) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction filed by Pro Se Plaintiff Antonio Paul Only. (JP) Modified on 1/25/2024 (JP). |
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") #2 is granted for the limited purpose of this order. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Court finds that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3); see Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). The Court grants Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days of this Order. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within 30 days or fails to request an extension of time to do so, the Clerk of Court shall be directed to enter judgment and close the case. ORDER ATTACHED. Ordered by Judge Natasha C. Merle on 1/18/2024. (copy mailed). (AG)
|
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (CV) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Antonio Paul. (CV) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of Labor, filed by Antonio Paul. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (CV) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Paul v. Department of Labor | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Antonio Paul | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Department of Labor | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
