Alahakoon et al v. Mayorkas et al
Suchintha Vishwajith Alahakoon and Savini Prabuddhika Jayasinghe |
Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur M Jaddou, Ted H Kim and US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland |
1:2024cv00239 |
January 10, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Rachel P Kovner |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The #7 stipulation of dismissal is so-ordered. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 2/16/2024. (NNW) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice by Merrick B. Garland, Ur M Jaddou, Ted H Kim, Alejandro Mayorkas (Speight, Melanie) |
SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial conference is scheduled for 4/16/2024 at 3:00 PM. The parties are directed to call (888) 278-0296 and type in the access code 2012636 to join the conference. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 1/24/2024. (NNW) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Melanie M. Speight on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Speight, Melanie) |
Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of District of Columbia; Case Number 1:23-cv-03090. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
The case of Alahakoon et al v. Mayorkas et al, has been transferred from District of Columbia to the Eastern District of New York. The new case number is 24-cv-239. PLEASE NOTE: if you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (AF) |
Filing 4 TRANSFER ORDER. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 12/20/2023. (lcrc2) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 1/11/2024.] |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Transfer due by 1/8/2024. (tj) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 1/11/2024.] |
Filing 3 Consent MOTION to Transfer Case to the Eastern District of New York, Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by MERRICK B. GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, TED H. KIM, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Simon, Jeremy) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 1/11/2024.] |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zdp) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 1/11/2024.] |
Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zdp) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 1/11/2024.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MERRICK B. GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, TED H. KIM, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10422440) filed by SUCHINTHA VISHWAJITH ALAHAKOON, SAVINI PRABUDDHIKA JAYASINGHE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT A, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT B, #3 Summons SUMMONS FOR U.S. ATTORNEY, #4 Summons SUMMONS FOR ATT. GENERAL, #5 Summons SUMMONS FOR ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, #6 Summons SUMMONS FOR UR. M. JADDOU, #7 Summons SUMMONS FOR TED H. KIM, #8 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET)(Ahmed, Sadaf) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 1/11/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.