Borisova v. Garland et al
| Elizaveta Borisova |
| Garland, Antony J. Blinken, Assistant Secretary Rena Bitter, Alejandro Mayorkas, Nicholas Heltzel, John Does #1-#10 and Merrick Garland |
| 1:2024cv00281 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Nina R Morrison |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Elizaveta Borisova. Rena Bitter served on 1/22/2024, answer due 3/22/2024; Antony J. Blinken served on 1/22/2024, answer due 3/22/2024; Merrick Garland served on 1/22/2024, answer due 3/22/2024; Nicholas Heltzel served on 1/22/2024, answer due 3/22/2024; John Does #1-#10 served on 1/22/2024, answer due 3/22/2024; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 1/22/2024, answer due 3/22/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Green card and signature) (Nimer, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Philip R. DePaul on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (DePaul, Philip) |
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that she receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 1/17/2024. (AD)
|
|
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and Electronic Service Upon the U.S. Attorneys Office: (1) The United States Attorney, as attorney for respondent, shall show cause before this Court why a writ of mandamus should not be issued by filing a return to the petition; (2) Within sixty (60) days of this Order, the United States Attorney shall serve a copy of their return on the petitioner herein and shall file the original thereof, with proof of service, with the Clerk of the Court; and (3) Petitioner shall file a reply, if any, with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of receiving the return and serve a copy on the respondents. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 1/17/2024. (AD)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Rena Bitter, Antony J. Blinken, Merrick Garland, Nicholas Heltzel, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (KD) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Nina R. Morrison. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number BNYEDC-17460315 by Elizaveta Borisova. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Movant Jennifer E. Nimer, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Nimer, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rena Bitter, Antony J. Blinken, Garland, Nicholas Heltzel, John Does #1-#10, Alejandro Mayorkas filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17458575 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Elizaveta Borisova. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons) (Goldman, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
