Xue v. Blinken et al
Plaintiff: Wei Na Xue
Defendant: Antony Blinken, US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Gregory A Richardson and Thomas M Cioppa
Case Number: 1:2024cv00440
Filed: January 21, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Ramon E Reyes
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2024 Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal by the Parties by Antony Blinken, Thomas M Cioppa, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Gregory A Richardson (Bashyrov, Jacob)
March 13, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob A Bashyrov on behalf of Antony Blinken, Thomas M Cioppa, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Gregory A Richardson (aty to be noticed) (Bashyrov, Jacob)
February 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Upon review of the complaint for a writ of mandamus, it is hereby ORDERED that:1. Within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order, or by Monday, April 8, 2024, the United States Attorney, as attorney for Defendants, is directed to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not be issued, and shall serve a copy of the response on Plaintiff, with proof of such service to the Clerk of Court;2. Plaintiff shall file a reply, if any, with the Clerk of Court within thirty (30) days of receiving the response, and serve a copy on the Defendants;3. Service of a copy of this Order, together with a copy of the complaint, shall be made by the Clerk Show Cause Response due by 4/8/2024. Ordered by District Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 2/6/2024. (ENE)
February 5, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION - GENERIC on behalf of Antony Blinken, Thomas M Cioppa, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Gregory A Richardson (aty to be noticed) (OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION - GENERIC, )
January 22, 2024 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, Thomas M Cioppa, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Gregory A Richardson. (CV)
January 22, 2024 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (CV)
January 21, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17482657 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Wei Na Xue. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Proposed Summons with address rider, #4 Exhibit i589 receipt notce, #5 Exhibit i589 letter notice, #6 Exhibit applicant prior EAD cards) (Schmidt, Curt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Xue v. Blinken et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wei Na Xue
Represented By: Curt Donald Schmidt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Antony Blinken
Represented By: Jacob A Bashyrov
Represented By: OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION - GENERIC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland
Represented By: Jacob A Bashyrov
Represented By: OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION - GENERIC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Represented By: Jacob A Bashyrov
Represented By: OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION - GENERIC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: Jacob A Bashyrov
Represented By: OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION - GENERIC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Director Gregory A Richardson
Represented By: Jacob A Bashyrov
Represented By: OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION - GENERIC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas M Cioppa
Represented By: Jacob A Bashyrov
Represented By: OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION - GENERIC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?