Antrobus v. OBCC Warden
Petitioner: Andre Antrobus
Respondent: OBCC Warden
Case Number: 1:2024cv00532
Filed: January 22, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lois Bloom
Referring Judge: Orelia E Merchant
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2024 Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 is denied without prejudice; that a certificate of appealability will not issue, 28 U.S.C. 2253; that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), any appeal would not be taken in good faith; and that in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). Signed by Deputy Clerk, Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 3/20/2024. (copy of appeals packet and judgment mailed to pro se). (JP)
March 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: For the reasons explained in the attached order, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 is denied without prejudice. As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. 28 U.S.C. 2253. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case and mail a copy of this order to Petitioner. Ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 3/19/2024. Associated Cases: 1:24-cv-00155-OEM-LB, 1:24-cv-00390-OEM-LB, 1:24-cv-00532-OEM-LB (CS)
February 29, 2024 Filing 6 Amended PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus , filed by Andre Antrobus.Associated Cases: 1:24-cv-00155-OEM-LB, 1:24-cv-00390-OEM-LB, 1:24-cv-00532-OEM-LB (JVC)
February 16, 2024 Filing 5 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus , filed by Andre Antrobus.Associated Cases: 1:24-cv-00155-OEM-LB, 1:24-cv-00390-OEM-LB, 1:24-cv-00532-OEM-LB (JVC)
February 14, 2024 Civil Case Terminated. (IH)
February 14, 2024 Case Consolidated. Lead Case# 1:24-cv-00155-OEM-LB. Member Cases: 1:24-cv-00390-OEM-LB and 1:24-cv-00532-OEM-LB. (IH)
February 14, 2024 Cases associated. Lead Case# 1:24-cv-00155-OEM-LB. Member Cases: 1:24-cv-00390-OEM-LB and 1:24-cv-00532-OEM-LB. (IH)
February 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Petitioner is granted leave to submit an amended petition under docket number 24-CV-00155 within 30 days of the date of this Order to address the defects noted in the attached. The amended petition must be clearly labeled "Amended Petition." If Petitioner fails to respond to this Order within 30 days or fails to show good cause why he cannot respond, the action will be dismissed.The Clerk of the Court is directed to (1) consolidate case Nos. 24-CV-00390, and 24-CV-00532 into the first filed case, No. 24-CV-0155, and (2) mark case Nos. 24-CV-00390, and 24-CV-00532 closed. All future filings are to be docketed in No. 24-CV-0155.The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to the Petitioner, along with a form petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241 and (3) note service on the docket. Ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 2/12/2024. (CS)
January 29, 2024 Opinion or Order ORDER: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is granted. So Ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 1/29/2024. (MM)
January 26, 2024 Filing 3 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (KD)
January 22, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Andre Antrobus. (KD)
January 22, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus , filed by Andre Antrobus. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (KD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Antrobus v. OBCC Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Andre Antrobus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: OBCC Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?