Ma v. USCIS Office of the General Counsel et al
| Tengfei Ma |
| USCIS Office of the General Counsel, USCIS Attorney General of the USA and United States for the Eastern District of NY |
| 1:2024cv00722 |
| February 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Robert M Levy |
| Natasha C Merle |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil Case Terminated. (AG) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice by USCIS Attorney General of the USA, USCIS Office of the General Counsel, United States for the Eastern District of NY (Schumacher, Robert) |
| NOTICE to Assign District Judge: The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this case to a district judge. (JM) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Natasha C. Merle. Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy no longer assigned as presider to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (DA) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tengfei Ma. USCIS Attorney General of the USA served on 2/2/2024, answer due 4/2/2024; USCIS Office of the General Counsel served on 2/2/2024, answer due 4/2/2024; United States for the Eastern District of NY served on 2/2/2024, answer due 4/2/2024. (SG) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert W. Schumacher, II on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Schumacher, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (KD) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to USCIS Attorney General of the USA, USCIS Office of the General Counsel, United States for the Eastern District of NY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (KD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USCIS Attorney General of the USA, USCIS Office of the General Counsel, United States for the Eastern District of NY, filed by Tengfei Ma. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (KD) |
| FILING FEE: $ 405.00, receipt number 1000012381 (KD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
