Ivankiv et al v. Mayorkas et al
| Lesya Ivankiv and Anatolii Khrustalov |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Acting Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Terri A. Robinson, Michael Valverde and Charles Akalski |
| 1:2024cv00875 |
| February 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Pamela K Chen |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lesya Ivankiv, Anatolii Khrustalov. Charles Akalski served on 2/29/2024, answer due 4/29/2024. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service Summons Returned Executed) (Hutton, Jonathan) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lesya Ivankiv, Anatolii Khrustalov. Michael Valverde served on 2/29/2024, answer due 4/29/2024. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service Summons Returned Executed) (Hutton, Jonathan) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lesya Ivankiv, Anatolii Khrustalov. Terri A. Robinson served on 3/2/2024, answer due 5/1/2024. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service Summons Returned Executed) (Hutton, Jonathan) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lesya Ivankiv, Anatolii Khrustalov. Alejandro Mayorkas served on 2/29/2024, answer due 4/29/2024. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service Summons Returned Executed as to Alejandro Mayorkas) (Hutton, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary McGarvey-DePuy on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (McGarvey-DePuy, Mary) |
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The United States Attorney, as attorney for Defendants, is directed to show cause on or before 4/23/2024, in writing, why a writ of mandamus should not be issued, and shall serve a copy of the response on Plaintiff, with proof of such service to the Clerk of this Court. On or before 5/23/2024, Plaintiff shall file a reply, if any, with proof of service to the Clerk of Court. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 2/23/2024. Electronic Service upon the US Attorneys Office re #1 Complaint filed by Anatolii Khrustalov, Lesya Ivankiv. (FG)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Charles Akalski, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Terri A. Robinson, Michael Valverde, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (MLR) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. by Lesya Ivankiv, Anatolii Khrustalov (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons with attached Rider) (Hutton, Jonathan) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SDM) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: If multiple defendants, there must me a rider attached to the summons with the name and addresses of all defendants included., Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (SDM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus and Other Injunctive Relief: Plaintiffs' Petition and Adjustment of Status to Lawful Permanent Residence against All Defendants filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17538720 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Lesya Ivankiv, Anatolii Khrustalov. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit Evidence In Support of Complaint) (Hutton, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
