Zheng v. Mayorkas et al
| Guiqing Zheng |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou, Rose Kendrick, US Dept of Homeland Security and US Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 1:2024cv01054 |
| February 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SDM) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Guiqing Zheng (SDM) Modified on 2/12/2024 (SDM). |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: No summons provided, please submit summons. The event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet., Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (SDM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17558246 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Guiqing ZHENG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I) (Yu, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
