Zhang v. Blinken et al
| Shao King Zhang |
| Antony Blinken, US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Director Gregory A Richardson and Thomas M Cioppa |
| 1:2024cv01215 |
| February 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Sanket J Bulsara |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 STATUS REPORT by Antony Blinken, Thomas M Cioppa, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Gregory A Richardson (Cooper, David) |
ORDER: On 2/29/2024, the Court directed Defendants to file a status report on Plaintiff's immigration application. They failed to do so. Defendants must file a status report on the immigration application by 4/9/2024. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 3/26/2024. (AL)
|
|
ORDER: Defendants are directed to file a status update on Plaintiff's immigration application by 3/21/2024. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 2/29/2024. (AL)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David Allen Cooper on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Cooper, David) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SDM) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, Thomas M Cioppa, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Gregory A Richardson. (SDM) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (SDM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17576011 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Shao King Zhang. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Proposed Summons with address rider, #4 Exhibit i-589 receipt notice, #5 Exhibit i589 biometrics notice, #6 Exhibit uscis case status) (Schmidt, Curt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
