Taylor v. Schaefer
| Trevor Taylor |
| CEO of QTC Larry Schaefer |
| 1:2024cv01287 |
| February 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Orelia E Merchant |
| Other Statutes: False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from New York Eastern has been opened in CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA as case 5:24-cv-00451, filed 02/27/2024. (TLH) |
| Case transferred to the Central District of California. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. (JVC) |
Filing 5
ORDER: The Court orders that this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. A decision on Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application #2 is reserved for the transferee court. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is hereby directed to transfer this action, in the interest of justice, to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. See 28 U.S.C. 84(c), 1406(a). Further, the Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to Plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 2/26/2024. (GM)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (JVC) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (CV) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Trevor Taylor. (CV) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Larry Schaefer, filed by Trevor Taylor. (CV) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/22/2024: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (CV). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Taylor v. Schaefer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Trevor Taylor | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CEO of QTC Larry Schaefer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
