Scott v. Harbeck
| Kevin Eric Scott |
| Dorothy Ann Harbeck |
| 1:2024cv01506 |
| February 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Natasha C Merle |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 REPLY In Opposition To Defendant's #12 Memorandum In Opposition To Notice Of Abatement filed by Kevin Eric Scott. (MLR) (Main Document 15 replaced on 4/23/2024) (MLR). |
ORDER -- Defendant submitted a letter requesting a pre-motion conference on an anticipated motion to dismiss #10 on March 27, 2024. Pursuant to Rule III.A.2 of this Court's #Individual Practice Rules, plaintiff was required to serve and file a letter response of three pages or less by April 3. Plaintiff still has not done so. Accordingly, plaintiff shall file a letter response to defendant's request on or before April 25, 2024. Furthermore, if plaintiff seeks to reply to defendant's motion in opposition of the notice of abatement #12 , plaintiff shall file such reply on or before April 25, 2024. Ordered by Judge Natasha C. Merle on 4/18/2024. (copy mailed w/NCM Rules). (AG)
|
| Filing 14 Letter Corrected cover letter to Plaintiff (same as ECF No. 13, correcting transmission information on the "cc") by Dorothy Ann Harbeck (Stannard, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 13 Letter Cover letter to Plaintiff enclosing Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Notice of Abatement by Dorothy Ann Harbeck (Stannard, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #8 Notice (Other) filed by Dorothy Ann Harbeck. (Attachments: #1 Stannard Declaration, #2 Harbeck Declaration, #3 Ruffino Declarataion, #4 Nunez Declaration) (Stannard, Geoffrey) |
|
ORDER granting #11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #8 Notice (Other) Notice of Abatement by Dorothy Ann Harbeck -- Defendant's request is granted on consent. Defendant shall file their response to plaintiff's notice of abatement in opposition of removal #8 on or before April 10, 2024. Ordered by Judge Natasha C. Merle on 4/8/2024. (copy mailed). (AG)
|
| Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #8 Notice (Other) Notice of Abatement by Dorothy Ann Harbeck. (Stannard, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for pre motion conference regarding Defendant's anticipated motion to dismiss by Dorothy Ann Harbeck. (Stannard, Geoffrey) |
|
ORDER granting #9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #8 Notice (Other) Notice of Abatement by Dorothy Ann Harbeck -- Defendant's request is granted on consent. Defendant shall file their response to plaintiff's notice of abatement in opposition of removal #8 on or before April 8, 2024. Ordered by Judge Natasha C. Merle on 3/25/2024. (copy mailed). (AG)
|
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #8 Notice (Other) Notice of Abatement by Dorothy Ann Harbeck. (Stannard, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Abatement in opposition of removal. (JP) (Main Document 8 replaced on 3/13/2024) (JP). (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/13/2024: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (JP). |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Dorothy Ann Harbeck re #1 Notice of Removal (Austin, Alina) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Defendant removed this pro se action from Queens County Supreme Court, invoking this Court's federal officer jurisdiction. ECF No. #1 . Defendant requests an extension of time to respond to the complaint. ECF No. #5 . Although plaintiff does not consent, as it is defendant's first request, and such requests are generally granted as a courtesy, defendant's request is granted. Defendant shall respond to the complaint by March 27, 2024. Any party seeking to file a dispositive motion shall consult Judge Merle's Individual Rules. See attached Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 3/5/2024. (VP)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Complaint by Dorothy Ann Harbeck. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Scope of Employment and Notice of Substitution of United States of America as Sole Defendant) (Stannard, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (CV) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (CV) |
| Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom. Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy no longer assigned to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (CV) Modified on 3/4/2024 (CV). |
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (CV) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Dorothy Ann Harbeck (Austin, Alina) |
| Notice: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. Please resubmit corrected Civil Cover Sheet. This event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (SDM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Dorothy Ann Harbeck from Queens County Supreme Court, case number 701915-2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Queens Supreme Court Summons and Complaint) (Austin, Alina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Scott v. Harbeck | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kevin Eric Scott | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dorothy Ann Harbeck | |
| Represented By: | Alina Austin |
| Represented By: | Geoffrey M. Stannard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
